Are the claims of  Oklahoma Sen. James Inhofe, a prominent skeptic of the global warming theory and the Republican leader of the Environment and Public Works Committee purely self-serving; or does he have a genuine interest?  His critics claim he is only protecting his big oil position.  What about Gore?  His wealth is tightly tied to his global warming claims and he openly professes that the environment was a fantastic business opportunity.

When little children see a movie that causes nightmares resulting in psychiatric appointments, is it not important to first question the wisdom of the parent that took their child to see the movie, “An Inconvenient Truth”.  Then is it not the duty of the little obscure, Senate Environment and Public Works Committee to question the scientific basis for the movie or verify that it is nothing more than a scientific scandal?   

Inhofe says it's important that Gore testify before the Congress and tell the full story.
Where is the Oscar winning and Nobel Prize recipient as the case for disastrous man-made climate change is collapsing?  Why the silence of this most famous advocate of “all things green” as opposition increases?  It is said that you can contact his web address (algoresupportcenter.com), but don’t expect a reply.  

The United Kingdom scandal last Fall exposed that leading global warming scientists conspired in e-mails to hide data that contradicted "proof" of man made global warming.
The Copenhagen Summit failed to reach acceptable climate change policies.  The U.N. found their climate change research report was flawed.  

The Obama administration continues to support regulations to rein in emissions.  Not a bad idea, but at what cost to the homemaker and business owners, both large and small?  To do this without regard to the probable redo of data by the British official weather office or other changes due to Climate-gate is irresponsible.

For more details click here.